In recent weeks there has been talk on social media of a new artificial intelligence technology that would challenge the credibility of future student assessments. So what is this new AI technology and what is its potential impact on education? This blog examines these questions and considers whether such advances in technology mean that now is the time to rethink how we teach and assess our students.
The technology everyone is talking about isChat GPT-3, developed by OpenAI. This tool is now the largest language model currently available. To use it, just ask a question or make a statement, hit enter, and the tool will instantly generate human-like answers in the form of essay, blog post, multiple choice question, poem, computer code, etc. The is much more sophisticated than anything we've seen before and works differently than a search engine. Essentially, it uses machine learning to predict the next word in a sentence based on previous text. The results are quite remarkable.
During the holiday season, social media was full of fun conversations people were having with Chat GPT-3. An example that made me smile was someone asking Chat GPT-3 to tell their son that Santa Claus wasn't real.
One of GPT-3's most impressive features is its ability to generate human-like responses, as demonstrated by the answer to Santa's question. But that also means that it's becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish a student's own work from work they've created using such artificial intelligence technology. A lot has come of itDebate on students using AI to cheat. Trotzdetection technologyIt is also evolving rapidly, the text matching services used by institutions would not detect plagiarism in these cases as it is technically original text but not that of a human.
However, this is not a new topic. If we remember the Corona times and the necessary online exams, concerns were raised about the increase in plagiarism cases because students had access to the Internet during their exams.
Perhaps now is the time to take another look at how we evaluate our students. Chat GPT-3 could be the catalyst that forces us to do this. One thing is for sure, given the increasing use of these AI tools, demonstrated by Jasper.AI's recent $1.5 billion valuation, these technologies are not going anywhere.
How we are changing our approach to assessment is a complex issue that requires input from our peers and policymakers.Professor Kathleen M. Quinlan and Dr. Edd Pitt from the Center for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Kent is already doing interesting work in this area..
However, to learn more about Chat GPT-3, I thought I would ask you for some tips here. I asked the following question: "What impact could Chat GPT-3 have on the rating?"
“There is no question that GPT-3 and similar technologies could make it easier for students to produce written work that appears to be of high quality. However, it is important to note that simply generating text does not guarantee that a student has actually learned the material.
In order to assess whether a student really understands a topic, one has to go beyond evaluating their written work. Teachers can use a variety of assessment techniques such as quizzes, exams, presentations, and group projects to ensure students have a deep understanding of the material.
So as you can see the response is pretty impressive! AI's answer identifies the relevant issue that the student or user may not understand their own material. This is an important point because while Chat GPT-3 can provide quick answers to questions, it does not develop students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills that are essential for academic and lifelong success. As a credit to Chat GPT-3, he goes on to offer some helpful suggestions as to how we might adapt our assessment techniques to measure student understanding levels. Considering I didn't actually ask him to suggest any solutions for me, it's quite remarkable that he managed to successfully predict this as relevant information that I would later find useful, although I ridiculed myself, that no proposal involved using Chat GPT -3. For example, asking students to critique an answer provided by Chat GPT-3. That being said, I still think we should also comment on the benefits that AI technology like this can bring to education. Teachers can and use the generated data to inform their lessons.
Since we were driving, I was wondering if I could get my new friend (Chat GPT-3) to give me some tips that would help me with my work. I asked the following question: "I like the idea of asking students to submit an assignment along with a video or audio presentation, what do you think?"
“Ask students to submit an assignment along with a video or audio presentation could be a great way to enhance their learning experience and allow them to practice different skills. Here are some potential benefits of this approach:
Multimodal Learning – Video and audio presentations can provide students with different ways to express their understanding of the material, which can be beneficial for students with different learning styles. This can also offer students the opportunity to practice different forms of communication that are important for many professional fields.
Increased engagement: Creating a video or audio presentation can be more engaging for students than writing an essay or answering multiple choice questions because it allows them to be more creative and expressive.
Authentic Assessment: Video and audio presentations can be more authentic than other forms of assessment because they allow students to demonstrate their understanding in a way that is similar to how they would apply that understanding in the real world.
Self-Reflection: Creating a video or audio presentation can be a great way to encourage self-reflection as students are able to reflect on how and what they are communicating which can be beneficial for their own personal growth.
However, it is worth noting that implementing this type of assessment may require more resources and technology, e.g. B. the provision of appropriate software or hardware, as well as more time for the students to complete the presentation and for the teachers to evaluate it. Additionally, you may need to provide guidelines, rubrics, and examples for students to follow so that they can evaluate submissions fairly and objectively.
In short, adding a video or audio presentation to an assignment can be a great way to enhance students' learning experience and provide a more authentic assessment of their understanding, but it needs to be well thought out and properly implemented to be effective."
Again, with the exception of the comment on learning styles, the answer is pretty impressive and underscores why video/audio assignments are so valuable. You will also be measured in your response by noting realistic concerns in terms of resources and time. The insightful, balanced answer was actually very helpful in deciding what might be the best method of evaluation in this case.
I would say the final summing up point of the GPT-3 chat is spot on, whatever rating we use needs to be well thought out and properly implemented to be effective. Well said Chat GPT-3.
Technology can be a tool for teachers and students, but it can't replace the role of a trained, engaged human teacher. As parents have come to appreciate during the pandemic, in-person teaching inspires students far more than Zoom school ever will.Should we replace teachers with AI technology? ›
AI can never replace the emotional support that teachers provide. Teachers are lifelong learners who continue to learn and grow throughout their careers. They are constantly adapting to new situations and the needs of their students. AI can't provide the same level of support that teachers can.Do you think computers will replace teachers in the future? ›
Though there are several advantages of making use of technology in teaching, the question remains – can technology replace teachers in Future Classrooms? Well, the answer is clearly no. Though beneficial, technologies can never replace a teacher.When a teacher is aware about changing the teaching learning process as per the available technology the teacher is said to have which knowledge? ›
Technological Pedagogical Knowledge
TPK is an understanding of how teaching and learning can change when particular technologies are used in particular ways.
Here's a short answer to that short question: Introducing new technologies will not replace teachers. Experience from around the world shows us that, over time, teachers' roles become more central -- and not peripheral -- as a result of the introduction of new technologies.Why shouldn't teachers be replaced by computers? ›
While artificial intelligence can teach students skills or reinforce difficult concepts for struggling students, it can't replace a human teacher. Human teachers will always be needed to manage the classroom environment and to give students the encouragement they need.Do you think robots will eventually replace teachers? ›
For all these reasons, it is unlikely that software or a robot will replace human teachers any time soon. It is even less likely if you consider that implementing robots in the classroom is not economically scalable, and does not bring major financial benefits.Why teachers shouldn t be replaced by AI? ›
Robots need inputs from humans. Teachers develop their own web of inputs through experience. Humans are the source of input in these robots. Teachers have their own complex system that works because they experience it as a human.Will we still need teachers in the future? ›
If teachers are provided with information like this, we can have tutors equipped with pedagogical skills and with exact knowledge on who to help and with what. So, we do still need teachers in the 21st century, maybe more than ever. But we need teachers who understand technology.Will computer based learning ever replace classroom teaching? ›
Is Ed-Tech becoming sophisticated enough to teach children the way teachers do? The answer to both questions is No! Technology is only a form of augmentation. Yes, it can help the process of learning, but it most certainly cannot replace the role of a teacher.
But now the question arises whether online learning will replace school classes. Traditional schooling and online school learning both have unique advantages. Ideally, people should learn to make the best use of both systems. But school classes should not be replaced by online learning.How will modern technologies change the way of teaching in the future? ›
It has allowed for more effective and efficient communication between teachers and students, between teachers and parents, and between and among students. Additionally, it has enabled educators to provide more engaging and interactive lessons that better meet the needs of students.What is the impact of technological changes on the teachers? ›
Technology enables teachers to improve their teaching methods and tailor learning for their students. Schools profit from technology by lowering the cost of physical teaching materials, increasing the efficiency of educational programs, and maximizing teacher time.How do you think the role of the teacher has changed with the use of technology in the classroom? ›
Technology is changing the duties of students and teachers in the classroom. Students are doing more of the educational lifting through learning modules and learning management systems, while teachers are transitioning to facilitators rather than the knowledge gatekeeper.What are 3 technologies that will change the future of education? ›
To name a few are Artificial intelligence (AI), Learning Management Systems (LMS), Augmented and Virtual Reality, Gamification, Blockchain.What are the negative changes technology has brought to education? ›
Technology Reduces Social Skills
Social skills play a significant role in a life of a learner. However, modern technology reduces social skills because many learners spend their time on the internet and mobile devices. They rarely go out to interact with their peers and learn from real life.
The benefits of using educational technology also include the improvement of learners' mental and physical health. By using these tools, students are able to enhance their learning and their cognitive skills, which in turn helps them improve their academic performance as well as their physical health.Will AI replace teachers in the future? ›
Teachers are here to stay
Despite AI's potential to promote accessible education, there is still room to question AI's future as a replacement of human teachers. Many put forth that the essence of teaching is something AI cannot replicate.
Computers are not yet advanced enough to convey emotions, and if they replace teachers, schools could become emotionally tough on us students. Unlike computers, teachers can adapt to each student's learning path, and find the best way to help an entire class thrive.Why teachers should not use technology in the classroom? ›
While this may seem like the future of learning, integrating technology in classrooms has its downfalls. Having almost unlimited access to the Internet, quick messaging, and games distracts students from learning. Also, continuous use of technology hurts eyesight and disrupts the human body's natural rhythms.
Robots cannot replace educators completely but they can be as their assistants. Robots can help school students to develop and improve their skills and assist them overcome the difficulties which they face during the education.What is the negative of AI in education? ›
A big disadvantage of AI is that it cannot learn to think outside the box. AI is capable of learning over time with pre-fed data and past experiences, but cannot be creative in its approach.Can Google replace teachers? ›
No matter how advanced or smart Google is, it can never come close to the knowledge and life experience a teacher brings. Several types of research have been conducted and it has been proven time and again that teachers bring about a change which no technology can.Can technology replace teachers advantages? ›
Whilst technology is able to take on a whole host of tasks, it does have its shortcomings – most prominently its inability to interact with humans. Technology can therefore facilitate the learning process but it cannot replace the role of the teacher.What are 5 disadvantages of technology in education? ›
1) it may be distracting to students, 2) it may disconnect students from face-to-face relationships, 3) it may make cheating easier, 4) it may disadvantage certain students, 5) it may cause students to use unreliable resources for learning, 6) it may make curriculum planning more difficult or expensive, 7) it may ...What will teaching look like in 2030? ›
By 2030, the old concept of "classes" will have morphed into dynamic study groups; integrated courses will be the norm; and expert teachers will engage students in interactive global learning communities using 3D Web environments, augmented reality, and mobile devices that we can only begin to imagine today.What type of teacher is most in demand? ›
Which teaching subject is most in demand? While specific needs vary by institution, science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) are subjects that are always in high demand.What is the future outlook for teachers? ›
Employment of high school teachers is projected to grow 5 percent from 2021 to 2031, about as fast as the average for all occupations. About 77,900 openings for high school teachers are projected each year, on average, over the decade.Can AI replace teachers in schools? ›
“It's unlikely that AI will be able to replace a microbiology teacher in the near future”. “While AI technology has advanced significantly in recent years, it is still not capable of replicating the complex process of teaching and guiding students in the way that a human teacher can.”Should teachers be replaced by computers debate against? ›
I think that teachers should be replaced by computers for four reasons – it allows each student to learn at their own speed; computers are the future and this is the only way to teach people how to use them; it would be lots of fun because they could also play games; and because computers are going to take over the ...
Technology is an innovation of humans, so the application of technology in education is also innovative; enabling the educator to engender a differentiated space for each student's own personalised learning. Educational Technology assists how educators impart education, both online and offline.Is online learning as good as classroom learning in 2022? ›
Online learning can be a great opportunity in 2022 but it involves less control of teachers over students. Only those students who possess a responsible attitude get maximum benefit. It is a combined effort of educators and students that facilitates an ideal learning environment.Will e learning replace face to face learning? ›
It is unlikely that elearning will ever fully replace classroom learning.Why traditional learning is better than online learning? ›
Learning that happens in a traditional classroom allows students to work together face-to-face. It's more direct, it helps students develop interpersonal skills that are vital later in life. Working as part of a group in a physical setting also boosts their overall confidence and motivation to achieve more.Will teachers still be needed in the future? ›
Good teachers are needed the world over. The UNESCO Institute for Statistics estimates that we'll need 69 million new teachers by 2030 to meet global education goals. This is great news if you currently are an educator or considering becoming one.Will online learning replace teachers? ›
But now the question arises whether online learning will replace school classes. Traditional schooling and online school learning both have unique advantages. Ideally, people should learn to make the best use of both systems. But school classes should not be replaced by online learning.How will modern technology change the way of teaching in the future? ›
It has allowed for more effective and efficient communication between teachers and students, between teachers and parents, and between and among students. Additionally, it has enabled educators to provide more engaging and interactive lessons that better meet the needs of students.Should we replace teachers with computers? ›
Yes, it can help the process of learning, but it most certainly cannot replace the role of a teacher. No matter how advanced or smart a computer program is, it cannot and will not replace teachers.What state needs teachers the most? ›
Mississippi saw the highest teacher-to-student vacancy rate in the 2021-22 school year. The state reported having nearly 69 missing teachers per 10,000 students. In comparison, Utah had less than one missing teacher per 10,000 students.Why virtual teaching will never ever replace classroom teaching? ›
The Environment Makes the Classroom
It is a necessity for learning to lead, guide, instruct, connect and grow as a teacher. The environment makes the classroom, which is why virtual teaching will never fully replace classroom teaching.
Online education enables you to study or teach from anywhere in the world. This means there's no need to commute from one place to another, or follow a rigid schedule. On top of that, not only do you save time, but you also save money, which can be spent on other priorities.
For all these reasons, it is unlikely that software or a robot will replace human teachers any time soon. It is even less likely if you consider that implementing robots in the classroom is not economically scalable, and does not bring major financial benefits.What will happen if the teacher will be replaced by robots? ›
Robots cannot replace educators completely but they can be as their assistants. Robots can help school students to develop and improve their skills and assist them overcome the difficulties which they face during the education.